<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geeky stuff about browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.owen.org/blog/3111/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.owen.org/blog/3111</link>
	<description>Thoughts on development and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mia</title>
		<link>http://www.owen.org/blog/3111/comment-page-1#comment-5665</link>
		<dc:creator>mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.owen.org/?p=3111#comment-5665</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this!! I was just reading through your site (which I think is excellent) - when the word firefox caught my eye - and, low and behold, a post with the answer to something that has plagued me for ages! - bookmarks having to be redone in each new browser.

I read your blog as I also (like most readers I assume) work in development, but to find an actual practical answer to a problem that has bothered me for  ever is a real bonus. Thanks again for the post.

Also, I&#039;d like to say how great your &#039;development drums&#039; podcasts are - do you have any more planned?

&lt;em&gt;Owen replies: thanks Mia. Yes, I&#039;m planning a new &quot;series&quot; of development drums podcasts shortly.  &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this!! I was just reading through your site (which I think is excellent) &#8211; when the word firefox caught my eye &#8211; and, low and behold, a post with the answer to something that has plagued me for ages! &#8211; bookmarks having to be redone in each new browser.</p>
<p>I read your blog as I also (like most readers I assume) work in development, but to find an actual practical answer to a problem that has bothered me for  ever is a real bonus. Thanks again for the post.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;d like to say how great your &#8216;development drums&#8217; podcasts are &#8211; do you have any more planned?</p>
<p><em>Owen replies: thanks Mia. Yes, I&#8217;m planning a new &#8220;series&#8221; of development drums podcasts shortly.  </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Monty</title>
		<link>http://www.owen.org/blog/3111/comment-page-1#comment-5594</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.owen.org/?p=3111#comment-5594</guid>
		<description>Agreed about Chrome – it is an elegant browser.  It’s been my browser of choice for a while now – and I use it across the three operating systems I use regularly (Ubuntu, OS X and Windows 7). Worth also pointing out that it supports the growing Google ecosystem very well – gmail/buzz, calendar, docs, wave etc. As we move increasing into the cloud – my hunch is that chrome will become even more useful. 

But I have to take you up on your points about both Safari and Microsoft. Why should Steve Job’s personality traits become the basis upon your choice of browser? Your argument that you do not use Safari because ‘Steve Jobs is a control freak and I don’t wish to be locked up in his world’ is not balanced. Conversely you could encourage people to use Microsoft on the basis that their co-founder Bill Gates is a good guy (which, no doubt he is). 

I have always been frustrated by fellow geeks – who share knowledge based on their preferences rather than balanced opinion.  (Slight rat hole but I happen to be a linux and OS X guy, but equally accept that both operating systems have their issues and that Microsoft works best for others).

You are right to exclude Internet Explorer (IE) on the basis of security and standards but wrong to exclude Safari. 

Safari is a decent browser (not the best, but importantly better than IE). Your readership should be aware that at the core of Safari sits webkit – an open source browser project, which started life from KDE’s Konqueror.   It is not a browser based on control freakery.

I accept that much of Apple’s hardware, such as the iPhone, does lock users in. But OS X  and apps such as Safari remain open at their core.  Unfortunately the ‘geekery’ of OS X and some of its core applications have been lost in all the hype around the success of iphone/ipod and very soon the iPad. 

As geeks we should be happy that finally users are moving away from Microsoft to viable alternatives. Sure Apple makes the headlines but we should at the very least be encouraged that people are joining the UNIX family (perhaps without even knowing it) and switching to OS X and using alternative browsers to IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed about Chrome – it is an elegant browser.  It’s been my browser of choice for a while now – and I use it across the three operating systems I use regularly (Ubuntu, OS X and Windows 7). Worth also pointing out that it supports the growing Google ecosystem very well – gmail/buzz, calendar, docs, wave etc. As we move increasing into the cloud – my hunch is that chrome will become even more useful. </p>
<p>But I have to take you up on your points about both Safari and Microsoft. Why should Steve Job’s personality traits become the basis upon your choice of browser? Your argument that you do not use Safari because ‘Steve Jobs is a control freak and I don’t wish to be locked up in his world’ is not balanced. Conversely you could encourage people to use Microsoft on the basis that their co-founder Bill Gates is a good guy (which, no doubt he is). </p>
<p>I have always been frustrated by fellow geeks – who share knowledge based on their preferences rather than balanced opinion.  (Slight rat hole but I happen to be a linux and OS X guy, but equally accept that both operating systems have their issues and that Microsoft works best for others).</p>
<p>You are right to exclude Internet Explorer (IE) on the basis of security and standards but wrong to exclude Safari. </p>
<p>Safari is a decent browser (not the best, but importantly better than IE). Your readership should be aware that at the core of Safari sits webkit – an open source browser project, which started life from KDE’s Konqueror.   It is not a browser based on control freakery.</p>
<p>I accept that much of Apple’s hardware, such as the iPhone, does lock users in. But OS X  and apps such as Safari remain open at their core.  Unfortunately the ‘geekery’ of OS X and some of its core applications have been lost in all the hype around the success of iphone/ipod and very soon the iPad. </p>
<p>As geeks we should be happy that finally users are moving away from Microsoft to viable alternatives. Sure Apple makes the headlines but we should at the very least be encouraged that people are joining the UNIX family (perhaps without even knowing it) and switching to OS X and using alternative browsers to IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

