<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google gets its mojo back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.owen.org/blog/3024/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.owen.org/blog/3024</link>
	<description>Thoughts on development and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:50:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynical</title>
		<link>http://www.owen.org/blog/3024/comment-page-1#comment-5203</link>
		<dc:creator>cynical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 00:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.owen.org/?p=3024#comment-5203</guid>
		<description>I doubt Google is basing its decision on &quot;values&quot;. It&#039;s a business. If operating in China was making Google profits it would stay. This week&#039;s Economist provides some commercial reasons as to why Google would decide to leave, and they sound a lot more likely than human rights principles.

If anything, if principles are what matter then Google should stay rather than leave China. It offers citizens a (censored) alternative to (heavily censored) Baidu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt Google is basing its decision on &#8220;values&#8221;. It&#8217;s a business. If operating in China was making Google profits it would stay. This week&#8217;s Economist provides some commercial reasons as to why Google would decide to leave, and they sound a lot more likely than human rights principles.</p>
<p>If anything, if principles are what matter then Google should stay rather than leave China. It offers citizens a (censored) alternative to (heavily censored) Baidu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: google将从”中国队“”被退役“再追踪 &#124; 文通博客</title>
		<link>http://www.owen.org/blog/3024/comment-page-1#comment-5166</link>
		<dc:creator>google将从”中国队“”被退役“再追踪 &#124; 文通博客</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.owen.org/?p=3024#comment-5166</guid>
		<description>[...] Google gets its mojo back [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google gets its mojo back [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

