I hadn’t really appreciated the role of GAVI here, but it does seem an effective use of aid resources – getting the incentives right to bring in the expertise and (medical) technology that is needed.

So I was then a little disappointed by your comment about those who act on the basis of science and rationality “often” doing do so on the basis of “higher” ethical standards than those with religious beliefs. Strikes me as a massive (and rather flippant) generalisation that doesn’t really fit with the rational and logical approach you take in the rest of your blog.

Owen replies: Pete – thanks. I don’t think that people who act out of fear of punishment, or in the hope of some reward, on a future Judgement Day are acting to the same ethical standard as people who reach a judgement about the right thing without thinking that they will be subsequently rewarded for doing so. And a substantial part of what some people believe they have been instructed to do by a religious authority – from promoting the spread of AIDS by criticising the use of condoms, oppressing women or blowing themselves and other people up – is downright harmful. But I accept that evil acts are not restricted to religious people, any more than good ones are.

You are right that my remark was flippant, and that it is a massive generalisation. But I’m unapologetic about saying that it is what I believe.

Owen replies: I am very touched; and you have indeed brought joy to my day. I cannot speak on behalf of the family you have helped today, but somebody, somewhere owes their life to you.

And thank you for standing up for what I firmly believe: that those of use who believe in science and rationality are also capable of high ethical standards – often higher, in my view, than those who act out of religious belief.